Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Scott Peterson and Other Death Row Inmates Allowed to Blog and Solicit for funds

What is with all these Prisoner Rights Groups? These assholes lost their rights when they decided to take the life of another Human. Here is an article which got my blood boiling. It is about how several Prisoners on California's Death Row are being allowed to Blog and post websites. Fucking Sickening.

Source: http://soyawannaknow.blogspot.com

From the forbidding, steely confines of San Quentin Prison's death row, scores of California's most notorious convicts have been reaching out to the free world via the Internet.

Scott Peterson's Web page features smiling photos of himself with his wife Laci, whom he was found guilty of murdering and dumping into San Francisco Bay while she was pregnant with their unborn son. It also links viewers to his family's support site, where Peterson has a recent blog posting on his "wrongful conviction."

Mustachioed Randy Kraft, condemned Orange County slayer of 16 young men, is looking for pen pals. So is convicted Northern California serial killer Charles Ng, who describes himself as shy and offers to sell his wildlife drawings.





Tattooed and muscled Richard Allen Davis, whose abduction and murder of 12-year-old Polly Klaas helped trigger California's "three strikes" law, is not selling his hobby crafts but wants correspondents.

"I dug my grave -- now I must lay in it," he says of his life.

Prisoners are barred from direct computer access that officials say could allow them to threaten witnesses or orchestrate crimes. Thanks to supporters and commercial services, however, many of the state's 673 condemned inmates now have pen-pal postings and personalized Web pages with their writings, artwork and photos of themselves -- often accompanied by declarations of innocence and pleas for friendship and funds.

Although some inmates utilize sites in the U.S., the nonprofit Canadian Coalition Against the Death Penalty has created Web pages or pen-pal ads for more than 100 California death row inmates. The site, unlike some others, is free.

Prisoners' mail privileges "make it virtually impossible to stop stuff from going out . . ." said Lt. Eric Messick, litigation coordinator at San Quentin. "That is how things get posted."





Since the mid-1990s, when a condemned inmate's column called "Deadman Talkin' " appeared online, use of the Internet by prisoners has proliferated in California and elsewhere.

While civil libertarians applaud the development as the exercise of free speech by isolated people, victims' rights activists decry it as an unnecessary affront to the loved ones of those whose suffering led society to lock up these prisoners.

"It's hurtful," said Christine Ward, director of the Crime Victims Action Alliance. "They are seeing a [convicted] person going on with their life, but the person they raised or married or knew does not get that opportunity. . . . That murdered person is not coming back."

Elizabeth Alexander, director of the ACLU’s National Prison Project, said survivors simply should steer clear of websites that would be painful to see. "It does not seem that you can design a limit on the 1st Amendment based on an expectation that victims will seek out something that gives them more pain," she said.





After the widow of an Arizona murder victim became outraged by the killer's online personals ad, that state's legislators passed a law banning inmates from the Internet even through outside contacts. In 2003, a judge declared it unconstitutional.

A year earlier, a judge had barred California prison officials from enforcing a rule prohibiting inmates from receiving materials printed from the Internet -- a measure officials said was partly to prevent encoded messages.

Missouri adopted a rule last year, similar to one in Florida, prohibiting inmates from soliciting pen pals on the Internet, saying that several had been scamming their new friends. Prison spokesman Brian Hauswirth said many solicitations were misleading, and one female prisoner received $10,000 each from several men who thought she loved them.

Randall Berg, an attorney with the Florida Justice Institute who plans to challenge the Sunshine State's pen-pal solicitation ban, said such rules violate free speech and reduce the odds that prisoners will be able to stay out of prison.

"They can't use a pen pal [anymore] to help find employment or a place to live," he said.





Writing to outsiders is beneficial even for death row inmates with slim prospects for freedom, Berg said. "Idleness is the devil's workshop."

The Internet essays of condemned inmates provide glimpses of their interests, thoughts and lives. And prisoner art abounds.

Former professional gambler Herbert Coddington, convicted of sexually assaulting two adolescent models and strangling two chaperons in South Lake Tahoe in 1987, used his page to invite people to commission his art.

Ng, found guilty in 1999 of 11 murders at a secluded Calaveras County cabin, said on his Web page that he draws endangered animals that remind him of his own struggle to survive.

"To raise money for my day-to-day items and additional art materials, I would . . . sell a small number of prints," he wrote.

Officials say inmates are prohibited from conducting a business. But "that is not to say they don't," Messick said.

Some prison artwork and correspondence even wind up on auction sites as "murderabilia." Officials say it is very difficult to tell how the items got there and whether prisoners are profiting.

Peterson, on his page on the Canadian website, announced in 2005 that he no longer would be responding to writers because some were selling his notes. But last month, he launched a blog on his family's legal defense site.

There, he wrote: "Knowing that there are rational, thoughtful people willing to look at the evidence, and some so kind as to drop notes of good will or send a small donation has a huge positive impact." By the end of the month, about 100 e-mail expressions of support had been posted.

Many inmates solicit mail on pen-pal sites. A serial killer looking for correspondents described himself as "lonely death row Teddy . . . seeking female teddy bear who is nonjudgmental."





Many prisoners' writings do not mention their crimes; others express remorse. Some who deny wrongdoing dissect the evidence and attack police, prosecutors and judges.

"Their saying [that] they were wrongfully convicted is a criticism of the government and . . . is the most central aspect of free speech," said John Boston, director of the New York City Legal Aid Society's prisoner rights project.

And there are the short stories of former Crips gang member Steve Champion, on death row for a 1980 double murder during an attempted robbery in Los Angeles County.

In one of his stories, Champion describes the silence and tension among condemned prisoners on days when one of them is to die.

"It is both eerie and sickish," he wrote, "as if some mysterious and awful sore is readying to discharge itself as the clock ticks down."

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hello!
Thank God somebody else thinks that these pieces of human stink are being molly-coddled are have a right to ANYTHING after the pain and suffering they inflicted on members of their own species.
The fact that they are still actually alive is an affront to my basic human nature.
If I could be sure there was a "hell", I would not hesitate to condemn them to it.
To have access to a "pen-pal" website in nauseating to me.
If you need any help in trying to halt this abhoration, let me know.
Kate Smith
1816 N. Gramercy Pl
Apt # 206
Hollywood
CA 90028
qed561@netscape.net

Anonymous said...

I always thought I believed in the death penalty - thinking of how I'd feel if someone killed anyone I love. The truth is that if I'm honest I'd be ok for someone else to give the death penalty to them, but not to do it myself - unless it was in the heat of the moment. That to me says that I am a hypocrite and the death sentence is wrong, no matter how evil the person.

I don't believe that if the death penalty is allowed that someone should be kept incarcerated for years waiting to die. They should die within months at most - to makethem wait years is torture, and even if they committed the worst crimes known to man - I would have no wish to be an evil sadistic torturer as well - what kind of hypocrite would that make me?

I 100% agree they should never be allowed to make profit from their crimes though - whatever form that profit takes.

On the other hand, communication with others outside while they wait for their sentence - so long as that is not romantic (thereby allowing exploitation of vulnerable individuals on both sides of the walls) or gaining any financial advantage - I think that is not unfair, and does not make their penalty any less harsh (as it should be).

If anything it can give them opportunity for further regret. Kate Smith, I have lost people and had loved ones hurt by others - God knows I'd have defended them with all my power and used force if I could have & if that would have protected them. But from what you say you are either in a very bad place mentally, or your 'basic human nature' isn't as human as you think. Do you really think it is ok to express murderous intent so long as it is in your view 'righteous'? Lord help you, try and remember that those who carried out the 9/11 attacks believed they were righteous too.

There is never any excuse to take a life. For ANYONE - no matter the reason. You realise that technically, if you killed one of these criminals you refer to, you would be no better yourself, and could end up in the same place?

HTBW said...

Thanks for your comment, the issue is definitely a difficult one. The question being, for what purpose is the death penalty? If the answer is revenge, then ya ok, it is really wrong. If, on the other hand, ones reasoning lies towards prevention of further crimes and reducing the tax burden on imprisonment then I am ok with it. Some may even argue the death penalty is a deterent, which it may in fact be to some. Although when someone stoops so low as to plan and pre-meditate to kill someone, do you really want the parole board to have the ability to release that psychopath, or even worse, there is the possibility of escape?

Of course there is always the issue of wrongful conviction which I'm sure is at the heart of every law abiding citizen. I can't even imagine sitting on death row knowing I did not commit the crime but facing certain death. Perhaps that is why there is such a long wait time for execution. Honestly, it can't take that long to order a needle.